Competitor Engagement
Signal: A prospect likes, comments on, or shares content from a competitor’s LinkedIn page, or follows a competitor account.
Window: 3–7 days after engagement. Their interest is active now. Past 2 weeks and the context is gone.
Why this works
Section titled “Why this works”This is the highest-intent signal that doesn’t involve a direct inquiry. Someone engaging with a competitor’s content has:
- Identified themselves as a buyer — they’re researching solutions in your category
- Told you their problem — the content they engaged with reveals what they’re trying to solve
- Done the qualification themselves — you don’t have to convince them the problem is real
Reply rates on competitor engagement plays are consistently 2–4× higher than standard cold outbound. The prospect already knows the category exists and is interested.
How we find them
Section titled “How we find them”This is one of BuyerBrains’ core proprietary signals. We monitor:
- Reactions (likes, celebrates, insightful) on competitor LinkedIn posts
- Comments on competitor content — especially substantive ones
- Follower growth on competitor pages (new followers = new evaluators)
- Competitor event registrations and webinar attendees (where public)
We scrape and enrich this data daily against your ICP to pull only the contacts worth reaching.
Reading the engagement
Section titled “Reading the engagement”| Type of engagement | What it signals | Your angle |
|---|---|---|
| Likes a “how to” post | Early-stage research, figuring out the approach | Educational opener — give them something useful |
| Asks a question in comments | Active problem-solving mode | Answer the question, then introduce yourself |
| Complains in comments | Frustrated with current solution | Validate the frustration, offer the alternative |
| Shares competitor content | Trusted it enough to amplify | They’re a practitioner, not just a looker |
| Follows the competitor page | Just starting to research the category | Broad opener — don’t assume deep familiarity |
The sequence
Section titled “The sequence”| Touch | Timing | Angle |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Day 3–5 post-engagement | Reference the topic (not the specific engagement) |
| 2 | Day 8 | A different angle on the same problem |
| 3 | Day 13 | Specific proof point vs. the competitor approach |
| 4 | Day 19 | Value add — resource relevant to what they were reading |
| 5 | Day 25 | Breakup |
Sample opening
Section titled “Sample opening”“Saw you’ve been following the conversation around [topic area] lately.
We take a different approach than most — instead of [competitor method], we [BuyerBrains differentiator].
Worked well for [similar company type]. Worth comparing notes for 15 minutes?”
The critical rule
Section titled “The critical rule”Never mention the specific post or engagement act. “I saw you liked [Competitor]‘s post” is a conversation ender — it feels like surveillance. Reference the topic, the problem, the category. Not the click.
What to avoid
Section titled “What to avoid”- Naming the competitor negatively — they’re already evaluating them. Bashing creates defensiveness
- Assuming they’re unhappy with the competitor — they might just be curious. Start neutral
- Waiting too long — past 2 weeks the engagement is stale and the connection doesn’t land
Want us to run this for you?
BuyerBrains handles the full system end-to-end — signals, copy, sends, and booking. Book a 15-min intro to see if we're a fit.